Vote Yes on this bill if you want Michigan local governments to rely on existing statewide opioid settlements, avoid more local civil lawsuits against covered companies, and give those settling defendants broader legal finality.

Organizations that support this bill may include pharmaceutical manufacturers, pharmacy chains, business associations, and state officials who want opioid claims handled through statewide settlements instead of new local lawsuits.

Vote No on this bill if you want local governments to keep the power to file or continue their own opioid-related civil lawsuits and seek additional accountability or compensation beyond statewide settlements.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include counties, cities, townships, school districts, local government groups, and public health advocates who want communities to keep the option to sue for more opioid-related damages.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want the House to endorse tax policies that let working families keep more of their income through tax breaks for tips, overtime, children, seniors, adoption, education, car loans, and health savings accounts.

Organizations that support this bill may include taxpayer advocacy groups, business associations, restaurant and hospitality groups, senior groups, and family organizations that favor lower taxes and expanded tax credits.

Vote No on this bill if you want to reject the House’s endorsement of these tax cuts because you believe they are fiscally risky, unevenly targeted, or less helpful than direct public investments and services.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include budget watchdog groups, tax fairness advocates, and public interest organizations that worry these tax cuts reduce federal revenue and may weaken funding for public services.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want to limit EPA oversight of many federal projects and agency rules in order to reduce delays, cut regulatory overlap, and speed up government action.

Organizations that support this bill may include business associations, construction and manufacturing groups, energy industry organizations, and others that want faster federal decisions with less EPA review.

Vote No on this bill if you want to keep stronger EPA review of federal projects and rules so potential air pollution and environmental harms are more likely to be identified before decisions are made.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include environmental groups, public health advocates, conservation organizations, and community groups concerned about weaker federal review of pollution risks.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want EPA to more easily exclude air-monitoring data tied to wildfires and prescribed burns, give states more flexibility, and encourage controlled burning to reduce the size and frequency of catastrophic wildfires.

Organizations that support this bill may include state forestry agencies, prescribed burn and wildfire management groups, western state and local governments, and business groups that want wildfire smoke and prevention burns treated more flexibly in federal air-quality decisions.

Vote No on this bill if you want federal air-quality decisions to keep counting more smoke pollution data, maintain stricter clean-air oversight, and avoid creating loopholes that could reduce accountability for unhealthy air in affected communities.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include clean air advocates, environmental justice groups, public health organizations, and community groups concerned that excluding more smoke data could weaken air-pollution enforcement and hide harmful health impacts.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want to repeal an old state law on telephone regulation and reduce government oversight of phone and telemarketing activity, if the related bill also becomes law.

Organizations that support this bill may include telephone companies, telemarketing firms, and business groups that want fewer state rules on phone services and sales calls.

Vote No on this bill if you want to keep existing state-level rules and oversight for telephone and telemarketing activity to help protect residents from unwanted calls and possible abuse.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include consumer protection groups, senior advocates, and privacy organizations concerned about weaker safeguards against unwanted or abusive calls.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want to stop automated bots from grabbing large numbers of tickets, protect purchase limits and online waiting lines, and give regular fans a fairer chance to buy tickets at normal prices.

Organizations that support this bill may include consumer protection groups, event venues, artists, sports teams, and ticket sellers that want fairer online sales and fewer bot-driven bulk purchases.

Vote No on this bill if you want fewer state rules on online ticket sales and do not want the government restricting how buyers and resellers use automated tools in the ticket market.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include ticket resellers, scalping businesses, and technology or business groups that worry about added regulation of online sales practices.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want tighter screening of private election funding, more public reporting, and stronger penalties meant to keep foreign-connected money out of election administration.

Organizations that support this bill may include election security groups, government accountability advocates, and groups that want stronger limits on foreign influence in election administration.

Vote No on this bill if you want election offices to keep more flexibility to accept private help, and if you are concerned the bill could add red tape, legal risk, and new barriers for groups supporting election operations.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include voting rights groups, local government associations, and nonprofit organizations that worry the bill could discourage lawful private support for election offices and invite more lawsuits.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want school bond and override ballots to give voters clearer cost, tax, project, and expiration information, along with stronger public oversight of how the money is used.

Organizations that support this bill may include taxpayer watchdog groups, government transparency advocates, and voters who want clearer information about school bond and override tax measures.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid new election rules and state review requirements that could add administrative burdens and make it tougher for school districts to renew or approve local funding.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include school district associations, some education advocacy groups, and local officials who believe the bill adds red tape and could make it harder to win school funding elections.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want Congress to study whether bank and credit union merger reviews are being handled consistently, within the law, and in ways that protect competition, stability, and access to financial services.

Organizations that support this bill may include bank trade groups, credit union associations, and business organizations that want clearer, more predictable rules for approving financial institution mergers.

Vote No on this bill if you want regulators to keep broad flexibility in merger reviews and want to avoid a study that could be used to weaken oversight or limit conditions placed on large financial mergers.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include consumer advocacy groups, antitrust watchdogs, and community groups concerned that it could pressure regulators to use fewer conditions when reviewing bank mergers.

Vote Yes on this bill if you want large standalone banks to follow the same tougher safety and oversight rules as other big banking firms to reduce financial risk.

Organizations that support this bill may include consumer protection groups, financial reform advocates, and watchdog groups that want large banks to face stronger oversight.

Vote No on this bill if you want to avoid expanding federal banking regulation and compliance costs for large banks that do not have a holding company.

Organizations that oppose this bill may include large banks without holding companies, banking trade associations, and business groups concerned about added regulatory costs.